The Cause Lost: Myths and Realities of the Confederacy (Modern War Studies) | 
enlarge | Author: William C. Davis Publisher: University Press of Kansas Category: Book
List Price: $15.95 Buy New: $9.69 You Save: $6.26 (39%)
New (20) Used (9) from $6.38
Rating: 10 reviews Sales Rank: 425987
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 224 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.8 Dimensions (in): 8.8 x 5.9 x 0.5
ISBN: 0700612548 Dewey Decimal Number: 973 EAN: 9780700612543 ASIN: 0700612548
Publication Date: May 2003 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: GREAT BUY!Brand New From US Distributor! WE ARE A 5 STAR SELLER with OVER 3,500,000 BOOKS SOLD!!! OVER ~ 675,000 FEEDBACKS ~ POSTED!!!
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description For nearly a quarter of a century, Pulitzer Prize nominee William C. Davis has been one of our best writers on the Civil War. His books--including Breckinridge: Statesman, Soldier, Symbol; Jefferson Davis: The Man and His Hour; and "A Government of Our Own": The Making of the Confederacy--have garnered numerous awards and enlightened and entertained an avid readership. The Cause Lost extends that tradition of excellence with provocative new insights into the myths and realities of an endlessly fascinating subject. In these pages, Davis brings into sharp focus the facts and fictions of the South's victories and defeats, its tenacious struggle to legitimize its cause and defeat an overpowering enemy, and its ultimate loss of will. He debunks long-standing legends, offers irrefutable evidence explaining Confederate actions, and contemplates the idealism, naivete, folly, and courage of the military leadership and would-be founding fathers. Among the most misunderstood, Davis contends, was Jefferson Davis. Often branded as enigmatic and incompetent, the Confederate president was simply a decent and committed leader whose mistakes were magnified by the war's extraordinary demands. Davis scrutinizes Jefferson Davis' relationship with his generals--most of whom were unproved talents or cronies with proven deficiencies--and reveals why only Robert E. Lee succeeded in winning Davis' confidence through flattery, persuasion, and a sense of responsibility. He also examines the myths and memories of the nearly deified Stonewall Jackson and of John C. Breckinridge, the only effective Confederate secretary of war. Davis also illustrates why the cause of the war--a subject of long-standing controversy--boils down to the single issue of slavery; why Southerners, 90 percent of whom didn't own slaves, were willing to join in the battle to defend their homeland; how the personalities, tactics, and styles of the armies in the turbulent West differed greatly from those in the East; what real or perceived turning points influenced Southern decision making; and how mythology and misinterpretations have been perpetuated through biography, history, literature, and film. Revealing the Confederacy's myths for what they really are, Davis nevertheless illustrates how much those myths inform our understanding of the Civil War and its place in Southern and American culture. This book is part of the Modern War Studies series.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 5 more reviews...
Destroying the Lost Cause myths November 25, 2006 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
William C. Davis, famous and rather prolific Civil War historians, faces the myths that constitute the Lost Cause doctrine and destroys a lot of them. The book is a collection of articles published previously on several reviews: they analize the relationships between Jefferson Davis and his generals, the forgotten fronts of war (South Carolina, Trans-Mississippi), and -last but not least- the southern attempts to find explanations to the defeat. The second half of the book is the better. The chapters devoted to the "forgotten fronts" are pheraphs too short and generic. However a very intriguing book.
Not indepth but... August 28, 2006 4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Mr. Davis writes for popular history in that he does not go too deep into any single issue but that he does reduce issues to the point that most readers can understand them. In this book he takes on several of the most enduring "histories" of The Lost Cause of the Southern view of the Civil War and for the most part effectively refutes them. He has done popular history a service by entering into this particular fray.
Most Americans recall of the Civil War revolves around what can loosely be called history, much of which is either partiallly or deeply wrong. Not all states for instance that left the US did so explictly mentioning slavery, here Alabama comes to mind (the majority of the CS did name it the first or chief reason for secession). The Lincoln pre war tax impost was a reason but outside of SC is seldom mentioned in any other state paper and at best is a minor reason or excuse for the war that resulted. Slavery and Federal interference (or threat of interference) with it, constituted the chief reason for secession. Of course the majority of Southern men fought to defend their homes, one can argue here poor men were manipulated into fighting for the rich slave holders if you take the view of poor always fighting rich men's fights. However, this and the failure of the CSA government, other then the military, to acomplish much in the course of the War is today only now being noticed or studied. Reading several of the previous reviewers it is obvious that no amount of scholarship will change their minds regarding the War, its causes, or lasting effects. Here is proof positive of Mr. Davis' points regarding The Lost Cause; yes history was rewritten, but by the losers. From the effects of various battles, the disregard in many Southern partisans' minds for the Western theater, hatred for those who after the War decided they were Americans again (Longstreet for instance), reasons why War came about, and coming up with reasons why the South lost all have been so colored by revisionists that non-Americans often wonder if the South had really won but allowed the North to think otherwise...
There are many books coming out now on the Southern homefront now that are direct contradictions to this revised version of history. The South was never monolithic in white opinion (look at CSA desertion rates, voting records on secession, & Unionist activity behind Southern lines) nor was it a simple all blacks being pro-Union but there were no New York or black Confederate units either. This history is complex enough that the simplistic Lost Cause version is slowly being crushed, the fusion of whats left will doubtless be closer to the truth.
The truth hurts February 1, 2006 2 out of 3 found this review helpful
I found the book refreshing. Especialy the chapter titled "Myths and Realities of the Confederacy." (Part Four #11) That section realy pulled together a lot of truths to combat the myths that have been foisted on the public by Southern writers since the war ended. Defeat is a bitter pill for anyone to swallow and more difficult for the prideful people of the south. To this day many will not admit to it.
Mr. Davis is an accomplished author and historian with whom I do not always agree but with this book he has "hit the nail on the head."
Excellent Thoughts on Civil War Basics, Mainly Confederate August 9, 2002 12 out of 12 found this review helpful
William C. (Jack) Davis is a prolific author on the Civil War whose books (and talks) are both extremely well-researched and entertaining. He would be on anyone's short list of the best Civil War historians, and is the History Book Club's reviewer for new Civil War books. His books specialize on the Confederate side of the recent unpleasantness between the states. Like his other books, this one is well worth reading for his illuminating insight into topics such as the relationship of Jefferson Davis to his generals, especially Lee, Johnston, Beauregard, Jackson, and Breckinridge; the Confederate secret service and the 1864 U.S. presidential election; and the reasons behind the development of the post-Confederate philosophy known as the Lost Cause. Only one chapter deals with the lost cause--for a detailed book on the lost cause, read Gary Gallagher and Alan Nolan's "The Myth of the Lost Cause and Civil War History." But Davis's Cause Lost is a must read for anyone interested in the Civil War.
A Revisionist view at best... May 14, 2002 11 out of 27 found this review helpful
To answer the last reviewer's comments, Yes, Slavery was a part of the reason for sucession, But it was not the whole +reason+. Several reasons brought about the war. One reason was the tarriff that the Northern States favored that was harmful to Southern Farm exports. And yet another reason was the idea of the Fundamental Concept of the Federal Goverment. Lincoln, believed in the Concept of a Strong Centralized Goverment while our Forefathers believed in a limited Goverment. Try reading a copy of the Declaration of Independence. The word united is in lower case letters while States is capitalized. I strongly suggest reading Jefferson's Davis book on the Rise and Fall of the Confederate Goverment. It is far more eye opening into the intent of the Confederate States then a History teacher's opinion. By the way, My Great/Great Grandfather fought not to defend *Slavery* but to defend his home from an armed invasion. He fought for his home plain and simple. Try reading the book "Black Confederates" to explore a little known part of the Civil War.And to answer the question of "Rich man's war, Poor man's fight", that is not always the case. A man is willing to fight and die for the truth, But how many will fight and die for what they know is a lie? A Liberal minded can not understand the strong word "Conviction" but that is why they fought.
|
|
|