Chronicle of the Roman Republic (Chronicles) | 
 enlarge | Author: Philip Matyszak
Publisher: Thames & Hudson
Category: Book
List Price: $26.95
Buy New: $15.62
You Save: $11.33 (42%)
New (31) Used (6) from $15.62
Rating:  14 reviews
Sales Rank: 568297
Media: Paperback
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 240
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.8
Dimensions (in): 9.9 x 7.4 x 0.7
ISBN: 0500287635
Dewey Decimal Number: 937
EAN: 9780500287637
ASIN: 0500287635
Publication Date: September 29, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
"A commendable addition to a series intended to make history accessible to general readers." —Choice
The Roman Republic was one of the most civilized societies in the ancient world, ruled by elected officials whose power was checked by a constitution so well crafted that it inspired the founding fathers of the United States of America. Here Philip Matyszak describes fifty-seven of the foremost Romans of the Republic, spanning the centuries from its birth to its bloody death and including the best and the worst of the Roman elite: Licinius Crassus, a kind father and loving husband who crucified slaves by the thousands, or Cato the Censor, upright and incorruptible, xenophobic and misogynistic.
Supported by a wealth of pictorial and archaeological detail, these personal histories provide an overview of the development and expansion of Rome, encompassing foreign and civil wars as well as social strife and key legislation. The biographies are supplemented by time lines, data files, and special features that highlight different aspects of Roman culture and society. 320 illustrations, 110 in color.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 9 more reviews...
 Great book. September 2, 2008
This is not only a good reference book, but also a good read. It provides a lot of general and specific knowledge about the Roman Republic for the non-specialized reader.
 Pretty Not Meaty July 1, 2008
Mr. Matyszak's Chronicle of the Roman Republic is a coffee table style book beautifully illustrated on nice heavy glossy paper. The book is comprised of biographical sketches of all the leading figures of the Republic presented in chronological order. The author presents a nice introduction to the Republic but this presentation style doesn't allow for a clear flow of the course of events as often more than one figure participates. Thus, specific events are occulted as the role of major figures is gleaned only through the course of dozens of pages. With no uniform image emerging the reader is left without much of a big picture understanding - events come and go with little connection from one to the other. Also the clipped writing style with occasional dangling modifiers doesn't help bring events to life. The author seems eager to tell his tale, but falls short.
 Smears, slurs and politics ruin a good book. February 4, 2008
2 out of 9 found this review helpful
In the story of Julius Caesar the book takes a political point of view. When the Gauls invaded Rome in the third Century BC the carnage was described as unparalleled in all history. 100,000's of civilized men, women and children were slaughtered by the invading Celts. When the Germans invaded Rome in the 3rd and 4th Centuries AD the carnage was worse.
This author through insinuation and perversity, letting his politics show, levels attack after attack on Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar is dead, he can no longer defend himself from the libels of this book. But that makes this author's smears no less perverse.
Very seldom was mercy offered on the Battlefield. At Cannae 50,000 Romans were slaughtered to the last man. Several Times Caesar did show mercy. His popularity among the poor of Rome while his opponents had the support of the Rich.
Julius Caesar's victory at Alesia is considered one of the 10 Greatest Battles in All History and his personal courage and brilliance beyond doubt. This author chooses to smear Caeasar by comparing his victories to the slaughter of native Americans by Europeans in the 1500's. Only problem with that is another half truth. 90% of the deaths by native Americans after Columbus occured through disease. That is an inconvenient truth, for someone honest, not so much a problem for someone dishonest. Columbus was no more a malfactor than Julius Caesar.
One professor I had in College credits Roman success to the Roman their absolute devotion and belief to the idea of Victory or Death. There were hardly ever any Roman Slaves; Romans chose to die on the Battlefield. That is why Romans won, because didn't want to pay the cost of losing.
The Prequel to Empire... May 17, 2007
5 out of 6 found this review helpful
Many have forged analogies between the empire of ancient Rome and the modern United States. According to some, the current decline of the USA mirrors, or at least shares some salient features with, the decline and fall of Rome. Of course such analogies have one major flaw, namely, that Rome didn't fall until long after it became an empire with a dictatorial emperor at its helm. But before Rome saw the likes of Caligula and Nero, it was a Republic ruled by an elected Senate with an hierarchy of various offices. Roman citizens, rich land-owning men, had voting rights and were, relatively speaking, "free men." In essence, the Roman Republic was a limited democracy with officials representing the citizenry, governmental checks and balances, and codified laws. Most, if not all, of that changed when the Emperor Augustus, adopted heir of Julius Caesar, gained supreme power following the Battle of Actium. The current United States resembles the Roman Republic far more than the subsequent Roman Empire. As such, modern Americans have far more to learn from the 27 BC fall of the Roman Republic than from the 476 AD fall of the (western) Roman Empire. Analogies between the USA and Rome should then start, and hopefully end, with the ill-fated Roman Republic.
"Chronicle of the Roman Republic" provides a good starting point for learning about this influential ancient government. But it goes further. Before the time of the Roman Republic looms the time of pre-historic legend. Here history mingles with myth and facts remain hard to substantiate. Blame the Gauls. They sacked the then miniscule city around 387 BC and destroyed most of the records. All that remained were fables speckled with bits of fact. Better than nothing. The book opens in this murky fog in which gods influenced human behavior and lineage. Rome's first rulers, in the time of legend, were Kings, and the book starts with the eponymous fratricidal Romulus. This first section also covers, via text box inserts, the Sabine women, the Palatine, Vestal Virgins, The Twelve Tables, the Etruscans, and the end of the rule of kings during the reign of Tarquin the Proud following the rape of Lucretia and the subsequent uprising lead by Lucius Iunius Brutus. The rest of the book delineates the rulers, or elected Consuls, of the Roman Republic right up to the final Consul, Octavian, who became the Emperor Augustus. Along the way the book covers the general culture of ancient Rome, its enemies including the Gladiator Spartacus, three Punic wars, and the gradual dissolution of the Republic. Around 80 BC Sulla Felix figured out that a strong army could overturn the will of the Roman Senate. He used one to become dictator. Sadly, others followed this example, including the infamous Julius Caesar, with whom the book deals at length. After the section on the Ides of March, the book concludes "History has been kinder to Caesar than he deserves." The final section leads up to the total collapse of the Republic with luminous names such as Brutus, Mark Antony, Cleopatra, Cicero, and Octavian. Civil war, conspiracies, and power struggles changed the 500 year old Republic into an Empire under the absolute rule of an Emperor.
"Chronicle of the Roman Republic" serves as the prequel to "Chronicle of the Roman Emporers," also published by Thames and Hudson. Together they cover the entire reign of Rome, from its founding in the 8th century BC to its demise in 476 AD. Rome often gets a bad rap as a barbaric and morally infantile regime, but it laid many of the foundations for what we now consider "free" societies. The books present the Roman story with accompanying eye-catching graphics, illustrations, and photographs. Throughout, the text remains accessible to newcomers and those just dabbling in Roman history. Ultimately, Rome's story provides an ominous example to modern day democracies. "Rule by the people," no matter how deeply cherished, remains forever vulnerable to power and brute force. Knowing the how and why behind an ancient toppled Republic, as revealed in these excellent volumes, may help prevent history from repeating itself in the present.
Great Introduction to the Roman Republic September 17, 2006
9 out of 9 found this review helpful
The history of the Roman republic--a story about how one city in Italy overthrew a monarchy, conquered her neighbors, united Italy, defeated all her rivals in the Mediterranean, and descended into civil war and ultimately monarchy again--presents a formidable challenge to any beginner. The republic itself was a political entity so complex it bewildered foreigners and Romans alike. Its magistrates--a dazzling succession of consuls, suffect consuls, dictators, praetors, aediles, tribunes and special commissioners stretching over nearly 500 years--were too numerous for even the Romans (who were otherwise quite happy to list these sorts of things) to bother recording them all. Finally, the evidence of who these men were and what, when, where, and why they did what they did lies scattered across coins, temple inscriptions, grave markers, bronze tablets, pottery sherds, and written histories that as often seek to justify as to inform. To reconstruct this fragmentary and sometimes unreliable evidence into an integrated narrative is far too daunting for even the most intelligent and motivated student, which is why anyone interested in beginning to take up the task should begin with The Chronicle of the Roman Republic by Philip Matyszak.
Dr. Philip 'Maty' Matyszak, an Oxford-educated historian and author of Enemies of Rome from Hannibal to Atilla the Hun, Sons of Caesar: Rome's Julio-Claudian Emperors, and the eagerly-awaited Political Sociology of the Roman Republic from Sulla to Augustus, has written a highly-readable, entertaining, and informative chronicle of the leading magistrates of the Roman republic. In 231 pages, Matyszak narrates the lives of 57 Roman leaders, beautifully embellished with 293 illustrations (98 in color), including maps, military diagrams, photographs of modern sites, coins, gems, mosaics, portrait sculptures, ancient weapons, ships, household artifacts, inscriptions, and modern paintings depicting Republican themes (such as the deputation to Cincinnatus and the suicide of Cato).
After a brief introduction covering "Republican Virtues" and "The Rise of Rome", the Chronicle is organized into four parts: the regal period, the founding of the republic, the wars of expansion, and the era of Caesar. The basic units of each section are devoted to a single Roman leader, including the famous (Scipio, Marius, Sulla, Cicero, Caesar, Brutus), the should-be-famous (Poplicola, Camillus, Marcellus, Livius Drusus, Sertorius), the historically important (Appius Claudius, Flamininus, the Gracchi), the notorious (Flaminius, Galba, Saturninus, Clodius), the legendary (Romulus and Remus, Numa Pompilius, Tullus Hostilius, Ancus Marcius, Servius Tullius), and of course those figures of Roman virtus (Horatius Cocles, Cincinnatus, Regulus, and someone the author calls "Cato the Stoic") who defined the Republic for many generations of students. Helpfully, each of the 57 figures are placed on a proper timeline, and they are listed with basic genealogical facts, offices held, principal achievements, and manner of death. The sum of all this is like a highly approachable and chronologically arranged version of Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (or, if you prefer, National Geographic meets Broughton's Magistrates of the Roman Republic).
Strangely, although the Chronicle comes to an end, it does not actually have an ending--no epilogue putting these lives into an overarching context. This is regrettable. The author's introduction contains a number of interesting claims that attempt to name the essence of the republican character ("They were hard men -- prudish, superstitious, brutal, and utterly uncompromising. And they were also unflinchingly, sometimes suicidally, brave. ... They were intolerant of weakness, exploiting it in others and despising it in themselves. They won their wars simply because, to this arrogant nation, the concept of defeat was literally unthinkable") and to trace the causes of the decline of the republic ("conquered peoples and freed slaves were welcomed into the ranks of citizens. When this policy of inclusiveness changed, the consequences led directly to the fall of the Republic"). Yet by the end, we have so many examples of the sexually shameless, the irreligious, and even the compromising (Caesar, Clodius, and Cicero readily come to mind), what are we to make of the generalizations in the introduction? Here an epilogue would have been quite helpful.
To be sure, the Chronicle does provide much of the context needed to understand the lives of our republican leaders, but it does this using a strategy that yields mixed outcomes. The basic technique is one that has always enjoyed wide use in popular magazines and has now become ubiquitous in college textbooks--viz., the "special feature" cut-away, those little boxes of text on seemingly random topics that interrupt the narrative and divide one's attention. To be sure, it's very nice to have listed the principal historical sources (Livy and so forth), the offices of the Roman constitution, and the Twelve Tables. Also, discussing the Twelve Tables in the context of Appius Claudius the Decemvir, Roman roads in the context of Appius Claudius the Blind, and Stoicism in the context of "Cato the Stoic" certainly seems reasonable enough. However, the placement of many special features make less sense. For example, "Trade and the Roman Aristocracy" interrupts the discussion of Livius Drusus to no good effect, whereas it could have been quite useful when introducing the lex Flaminia or discussing Cato the Elder. Why, in the context of Tiberius Gracchus, we should learn how to don a toga still mystifies me, though in the context of his brother Gaius, the special feature on the publicani was quite apt. Again, the section on Pompey is strangely interrupted by a cut-away on gladiators (and not even because he mentions that Pompey had a real taste for the games), whereas the section on Crassus (who fought a whole army of gladiators) has only a small picture of an archaic one. For this cut-away strategy, it's hard to know whether to blame the author or not: sometimes editors can be such unconscionable populares.
Although the Chronicle is a very good introduction to the men, events, and society of the Roman republic, its biographical approach needlessly omits much regarding the moral and philosophical ideas that motivated these men. With the exception of the influence of Stoicism on Cato the Younger, one seldom gets the impression that the Romans thought very much or very deeply about where they were going, why they were going there, and what fundamentally they were fighting about. Then (as now) ideas mattered: at the root of many social conflicts was a culture clash (e.g., between Hellenism and the agrarian mos maiorum), and for the Romans whose civitas justified (at least in their own eyes) the annihilation of iron age tribes, it would have been nice to have heard a bit from the men who distinguished the Romans from such expansionist tribes as the Huns. The polymath Varro, the philosopher Lucretius, the poet Catullus, and comedian Plautus must have expressed what some of the leading Romans thought of themselves, their world, and their colleagues, and their voices must be considered at least as important as the method for donning a toga.
With only these two criticisms, however, I couldn't recommend either a better introduction to the Republic or a more enjoyable reference work for even the well-read Romanophile.
|
|
|
