Travel With Books

Search Advanced SearchView Cart   Checkout   
 Location:  Home » Europe » Elsevier » Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models [An article from: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management]  
Categories
Africa
Asia
Australia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
Latin America
Middle East
North America
South America
United States
Disney
Blog Roll

GolfBlogger: Golf News, Golf Reviews and Golf Opinion

Golf Travel Books

Related Categories
• Elsevier
By Publisher
eDocs
Formats
Custom Stores
• Travel
HTML
Formats
eDocs
Formats
• Monaco
Europe
Travel
Subjects
Books
• Beaches
Reference & Tips
Travel
Subjects
Books
• Ecotourism
Specialty Travel
Travel
Subjects
Books
• San Diego
California
States
United States
Travel
• General
Travel
Subjects
Books
• General AAS
Travel
Subjects
Books
• HTML
Format (feature_browse-bin)
Refinements
Books

Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models [An article from: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management]

Accounting for stochastic shadow values of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models [An article from: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management]

zoom enlarge 
Authors: D.k. Lew, D.m. Larson
Publisher: Elsevier
Category: Book

Buy New: $8.95




Format: Html
Media: Digital

ASIN: B000RR5FRY

Availability: Available for download now

Editorial Reviews:

Product Description
This digital document is a journal article from Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, published by Elsevier in . The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Media Library immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Description:
In this paper, a discrete-choice recreation demand model that explicitly accounts for a stochastic shadow value of time function is proposed. Using data from a survey of San Diego beach users, the stochastic shadow value of time, labor supply, and beach choice are jointly estimated. Results from this joint estimation approach are compared with the familiar two-step approach that estimates labor supply first and uses predicted values of time in the recreational site choice model. The approaches produce markedly different welfare measures, with the two-step model, which does not account for unobserved variability of time values, predicting significantly higher values. A Monte Carlo simulation illustrates how ignoring the stochastic nature of shadow value of time in discrete-choice recreation demand models can bias model parameters, and hence, welfare estimates.


Powered by Associate-O-Matic